 |
 |
 |
Although the administrators and moderators will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Haymarket nor the developers of this software will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please click here to contact us and inform us of the problem. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service will be edited or removed with immediate effect. |
|
|
|
 |
|
@Marussia_F1Team: "A v Good Morning from a V cold Circuit de Catalunya. Ice on the windscreen means cold out on track - need some F1 cars to blaze a trail."
@OfficialSF1Team: "Today @NicoHulkenberg will be at the wheel of the C32, continuing the programme that @EstebanGtz started yesterday. It's pretty cold!!"
@Lotus_F1Team: "Good Morning from Barcelona. Another chilly morning, but a clearer sky than yesterday."
Yesterday Pastor Maldonado said progress with the new car was clear to see. You can read his views here.
Fernando Alonso believes the F138 is capable of challenging for the 2013 world championship - which might sound a bit premature but for his pretty undeniable logic that if he almost won with last year's car, he stands an even better chance in the forthcoming campaign.
Temperatures have confused the picture slightly, but nearly every driver down the pitlane reported extremely high degradation yesterday. Rosberg, Vettel and Alonso were among those surprised by just how quickly the new compounds dropped off. Read it here.
"Valtteri back in for further changes - old tyres and cold track not the easiest first run! But we've got some good data already"
Williams was sure it's design was legal. Perhaps not, said the FIA.
We're opening up AUTOSPORT Live to all your questions this morning, with our F1 Editor Edd Straw poised and ready. Get sending to live@autosport.com.
Hamilton 23
Perez 15
Bottas 26
Pic 15
Vettel 18
Chilton 16
Ricciardo 16
Alonso 11
Hulkenberg 15
di Resta 13
Raikkonen 4
Do you think it was an advantage or disadvantage for Williams to debut the FW35 later, and in doing so having more time to develop it?
Edd Straw: "As a rule of thumb, sacrificing one-third of your pre-season running when it is at such a high premium is not a good thing. But as Williams technical director Mike Coughlan pointed out yesterday the decision hinged on the value of Jerez as a test venue.
"Coughlan claims that the car would definitely have been ready for the first test had it been at Barcelona and that the car has run reliably following exhaustive dyno work back at base.
"The fact that it was the only team to take this path suggests one of two things; either Williams was wrong to do it or Coughlan has made a bold decision that could look very wrong if the team struggles in 2013. Based on its current start, it doesn't appear to be a major handicap."
@Lotus_F1Team: "We can officially deny any rumours that we're having an exceptionally long breakfast; we're changing gearbox. Running will be resumed soon."
Year after year we see designs appearing during the pre-season tests which are subject to discussion. This year again with the Caterham and Williams vanes to conduct exhaust flows. Why are teams allowed to run "illegal" car designs during testing? Is this only to allow testing gear to be fitted to the car?
Edd Straw: "Only the safety regulations apply during testing. As of last year, teams had to pass all of the mandatory crash tests before running. To regulate testing is unnecessary because it is private practice, so it's for the same reasons as football teams don't have official referees supervising training.
"On a practical basis, bringing all of the testing and measuring equipment, not to mention scrutineers, would be costly. Also, you can be sure that teams would constantly try throwing dubious parts at the cars as test cases given that there would be no real consequences to failing scrutineering.
"If Williams and Caterham run the parts in Melbourne, they run the risk of exclusion. The FIA's representatives, such as Charlie Whiting, are able to offer informal advice to the teams about certain things on the cars, either off their own bat or when asked, however."
Why does the FIA (and stewards) wait until the first race to formulate a definite answer on the legality of designs? Wouldn't it be more clear and less open for discussion to issue official warnings to teams before the first race?
Edd Straw: "The FIA has told Williams and Caterham what it thinks - that the vanes are illegal. That is as good as a promise that if they were on the cars in Australia, they would report the matter for the stewards for deliberation.
"At this point, the teams would be able to make their own case, and it would be down to the stewards to make the final decision. Remember, last year the Red Bull was declared illegal by technical delegate Jo Bauer after qualifying at Hockenheim, but the stewards rejected this (albeit with some reservations). But don't make the mistake of thinking that the stewards and the technical team are necessarily of one mind or interchangeable. In this case, the technical team are the police and the stewards the judges - which fundamentally is a sensible system.
"Resolving these problems outside of race weekends does happen, usually behind closed doors, but it is not possible to make an official ruling based on test trim as cars are allowed to run underweight, covered in sensors or even with parts that might not be legal until next year."
Edd Straw: "It depends what the team's programme is and probably makes little difference overall.
"Giving a driver back-to-back days perhaps helps with momentum, but the day-on, day-off strategy allows a driver to spend a day in between following progress from the outside. There's probably no better or worse way to do it provided you give equal time and don't always condemn the same driver to doing the first day when the track is at its worst."
Edd Straw: "It's going to be a difficult year. He's got the ability to make the most of an opportunity if one presents himself, but his own prediction of not winning a race this year could prove accurate.
"A reasonable forecast right now would probably be either no wins or one win, but let's see how the Mercedes looks as testing advances and more parts are added to the car."
(We'll be finding out his full reaction this evening).
Edd Straw: "The idea of an unrestricted formula is an enticing one. I'm going to hand you over to Adrian Newey to answer that!"
Perez 97
Vettel 84
Raikkonen (43)
Hamilton (121)
Alonso (76)
Bottas (98)
Ricciardo (70)
Di Resta (62)
Hulkenberg (88)
Chilton (67)
Pic (102)