 |
 |
As it happened: Test day three
The live commentary has ended. No further updates will be posted.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
FASTEST TIMES |
 |
P |
Driver |
Team |
Time |
1 |
Hamilton | Mercedes | 1m20.558s |
2 |
Massa | Ferrari | 1m21.266s +0.708 |
3 |
Sutil | Force India | 1m21.627s +1.069 |
4 |
Maldonado | Williams | 1m22.305s +1.747 |
5 |
Bottas | Williams | 1m22.468s +1.910 |
6 |
Gutierrez | Sauber | 1m22.553s +1.995 |
7 |
Webber | Red Bull | 1m22.658s +2.100 |
8 |
Perez | McLaren | 1m22.694s +2.136 |
9 |
Vergne | Toro Rosso | 1m23.223s +2.665 |
10 |
Grosjean | Lotus | 1m23.380s +2.822 |
11 |
Valsecchi | Lotus | 1m23.448s +2.890 |
12 |
Bianchi | Marussia | 1m24.028s +3.470 |
13 |
van der Garde | Caterham | 1m24.235s +3.677 |
 |
All timing unofficial. Updated: 15:57 GMT |
 |
OVERVIEW |
DAY THREE |
 |
CURRENT WEATHER |
 |
 |
Mainly sunny |
High Temp: |
14°C / 57°F |
Track: |
Dry |
|
 |
 |
Red Bull: Webber
Ferrari: Massa
McLaren: Perez
Lotus: Valsecchi (am)/TBA (pm)
Mercedes: Hamilton
Williams: Maldonado (am)/#BOTTAS (pm)
Sauber: Gutierrez
Toro Rosso: Vergne
Force India: Sutil
Caterham: van der Garde
Marussia: Bianchi
Be sure to come back at 2pm Spanish time (1pm UK) for the afternoon session, when we expect some of the teams to try race runs.
@scarbsF1: “It’s not clear who will run it in Melbourne. Indeed, Melbourne isn't a good track to exploit the passive DRS. But so far, Red Bull, Sauber, Mercedes and Lotus have tested it. I'd expect them to test it on Friday in Malaysia, as it has longer straights.”
@scarbsf1: “It’s a shame to say, but I don't see them having many chances for scoring points in normal conditions. So far, Marussia might have the edge, but Caterham has yet to run its new aero package so the balance will vary through the season.”
@scarbsf1:"The main reason is that F1 cars are so complex and integrated that it takes time to mature your design to the same level as the experienced teams. You can speed up this process with more money to buy more resources. Copying won't help, as although you can make a part that looks similar, you cannot understand exactly how it works and you end up being slower."
@scarbsf1: “The Red Bull and, in particular, the Sauber systems are very well-integrated. I still think the Lotus and Mercedes systems are 'tacked' onto the car.”
@scarbsf1: “I think it’s just a visual thing and I'm sure the nose is low enough. But the vanity panel can still form a slightly higher tip than the rules, which demand the crash structure inside the nose is lower than 550mm, state.”
@scarbsf1: “The unmarked tyres Hamilton run were prototype soft-compound tyres.”
@scarbsf1: “That would be a good-cost cutting measure. Aside from updated crash tests, there isn't a lot of difference in the monocoques year-on-year. As much as teams say their cars are all new each year, the cars are so complex that many parts have little performance impact and never change. You will find components on the Red Bull that still bear part numbers from the Stewart days!”
@scarbsf1: “It got its name from Henri-Marie Coanda, who discovered the effect in 1930. It’s the tendency for a flow of gas to follow a curved surface. Teams curve down the bodywork behind the exhaust to turn from pointing upwards (as per the rules) to downwards towards the diffuser.”
@scarbsf1: “I don't think speeds will be that much slower and the cars certainly won’t be slow or quiet! As the different types of energy recovery system are controlled by the throttle pedal rather than a button, there will be less of a push-to-pass effect. In some respects this might hinder overtaking.”
@scarbsf1: “I'm surprised the concept wasn't banned in the 2013 regulations. It’s legal, but I don't agree with it. I wouldn't be surprised if one accident caused by the system saw it banned immediately. However, if you can get it working, it is definitely a benefit.”
Hamilton (medium)
Sutil (hard)
Massa (soft)
Gutierrez (soft)
Vergne (medium)
Grosjean (medium) and coming in
van der Garde (soft)
Hope to see you all tomorrow!